Product tour

See what a Gatekeeper evaluation actually looks like.

Explore an illustrative dashboard with fictional suppliers and example figures. For findings from a saved synthetic evaluation, see the worked example.

EXAMPLE DATA RFP 24-0817 Project Kristiansund Tie-Back Buyer Example Buyer Vendors 3 · Docs parsed 47
Procurement Evaluation Dashboard RFP-24-0817 · Hybrid Umbilical System · v4.7
SCORED 03/04 11:03 ILLUSTRATIVE SCORES COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE

Weighted criteria — all vendors

6 AXES · WEIGHTED 0–100
Example Supplier A 78.5
Supplier B 67.75
Supplier C 60.25
Weighting Adjust criteria importance per project — defaults pulled from your procurement policy.
Ranking Vendors ranked by total weighted score, not the cheapest bid.
Pass / fail Determined by mandatory compliance — any M-tagged failure blocks award.
RANK 01
Example Supplier A
€5,800,000 · 13 months ARO
PASS
78.5/ 100 +10.75 vs #2
Technical88
HSE92
Pricing64
Delivery72
Commercial82
References78
RANK 02
Supplier B
€5,100,000 · 42 wks ARO
FAIL
67.75/ 100 HSE gap — mandatory
Technical78
HSE54
Pricing88
Delivery85
Commercial62
References55
RANK 03
Supplier C
€5,400,000 · 46 wks ARO
FAIL
60.25/ 100 Commercial gaps
Technical62
HSE66
Pricing78
Delivery70
Commercial42
References58

Total contract value — cost breakdown

EUR · 3 VENDORS
Supplier ASLB · DDP Kristiansund
Cable €4.56M
Term €1.02M
FAT
€5.80M
Supplier BDDP Kristiansund · DNV witnessed
Cable €3.88M
Term €1.07M
FAT
€5.10M
Supplier CDDP Kristiansund · 46wk ARO
Cable €4.20M
Term €1.00M
FAT
€5.40M
Base cable (2,400m)
Terminations, test heads
FAT, documentation

Unit rate — €/meter cable

NORMALISED
Supplier B · 2,400m
€1,616
Supplier C · 2,400m
€1,750
Supplier A · 2,400m
€1,900
Market median · 24f 8t 2tp
€1,705
Δ highest vs lowest
+17.6%
Line item
Supplier A
Supplier B
Supplier C
Flag
Hybrid base cable24f · 8×½″ tubes · 2tp
€4,560,000
€3,880,000
€4,200,000
OK
Terminations & test headsincl. bend stiffeners
€1,020,000
€1,070,000
€1,000,000
OK
Advance payment% of contract at NTP
25%
20%
20%
HIGH
Retentionheld until final acceptance
2%
5%
2%
Δ 3pp
Quoted vs BOM totaldiscrepancy detected
+€110k
−€40k
—
Review

Compliance requirements — vendor-by-vendor

M = MANDATORY
Requirement
Supplier A
Supplier B
Supplier C
Weight
DNV-ST-F119 certificationM
PASS
PASS
PASS
10%
API 17E complianceM
PASS
PASS
FAIL
10%
HSE incident record < 0.5 LTIFRM
PASS
FAIL
PASS
15%
NORSOK Z-001 alignment
PASS
PARTIAL
PASS
8%
DNV-ST-F101 alignment
PARTIAL
PASS
PASS
6%
FAT — DNV witnessed
PASS
PASS
PARTIAL
8%
Retention ≤ 3% of contract
PASS (2%)
FAIL (5%)
PASS (2%)
5%
Insurance — €10M min
PASS
PASS
N/A
4%
Local-content commitment
PARTIAL
PASS
PASS
4%
Mandatory failures
0
1
1
Award gate

Delivery timeline — weeks after receipt of order (ARO)

TARGET 48W
W05W10W15W20W25W30W35W40W45W50W55W60
Supplier B42 wks · fastest
Eng 10w
Mfg 28w
FAT
NTP
Design freeze
Delivery W42
TARGET 48W
Supplier A13 months ARO
Eng 14w
Mfg 40w
FAT
Long-lead mat.
Delivery W52
TARGET 48W
Supplier C46 wks ARO
Eng 12w
Mfg 29w
FAT
Kickoff
Delivery W46
TARGET 48W
Engineering
Manufacturing
FAT & documentation
Target deadline

Technical specification — parameter-by-parameter

14 PARAMETERS · vs RFP
Parameter / RFP requirement
Supplier A
Supplier B
Supplier C
Cable length (2,400 m)
2,400m ✓
2,400m ✓
2,400m ✓
Fiber count (min 24)
24f ✓
24f ✓
24f ✓
Super-duplex tubes (min 6 × ½″)
8 × ½″ over-spec
5 × ½″ under
6 × ½″ ✓
Electrical conductors (min 2 twisted pair)
2 tp ✓
4 conductors alt
3 × 6mm² ✓
Design standard
F119 + 17E
F101 + 17E
F119 + Z-001
Min bend radius (RFP < 2.5m)
2.1m ✓
2.3m ✓
2.7m fail
Crush resistance (kN/m)
450 ✓
420 ✓
410 ✓
Design life (years)
30y over
25y ✓
25y ✓

Overall risk score — by vendor

0 = LOW · 100 = HIGH
Supplier A
LOW
28
Supplier C
MED
54
Supplier B
HIGH
78
Risk threshold
ESCALATE
70
● CRITICAL 1
● HIGH 3
● MED 4
● LOW 6
CRITSupplier B
HSE incident record below threshold
LTIFR 0.82 exceeds RFP mandatory ceiling of 0.5. Award blocked pending waiver from Example Buyer HSE board.
HIGHSupplier C
Missing API 17E certification
Supplier C provided DNV-ST-F119 + NORSOK Z-001 only. RFP requires 17E — mandatory compliance gap.
HIGHSupplier B
Retention clause 5%, exceeds 3% cap
Retention 5% of contract is €255k above RFP commercial terms. Renegotiation required before NTP.
HIGHSupplier A
BOM total discrepancy €110k
Quoted €5.8M vs line-item total €5.91M. Vendor to confirm binding total before award.
MEDSupplier A
Delivery exceeds target by 4 weeks
Delivery W52 vs target W48. Float absorbed by installation window but reduces contingency.
MEDSupplier C
Min bend radius 2.7m — above RFP
RFP ceiling 2.5m. Supplier C at 2.7m. Installation spool re-design estimated €60–90k.
24 PASS 7 REVIEW 2 MAND. FAIL RECOMMENDATION Example Supplier A — award PDF DOWNLOAD IN THE APP v4.7
Illustrative dashboard · example figures

Run your own evaluation — with evidence in view.

Run your own evaluation →
Processing time varies · No card required