Synthetic worked example
A lower quote can hide a more expensive decision.
This example uses synthetic supplier bids and a sample industrial RFP. It is a product demonstration, not a customer testimonial or a verified saving.
Outcome: no award recommended. Neither bidder passed every mandatory requirement on the evidence supplied.
What the evaluation surfaced
| Check | Finding | Buyer action |
|---|---|---|
| Missing evidence | Nordkabel's certificate and qualification references were not supported by the required attachments. | Request the actual evidence and have a reviewer verify its scope and validity. |
| Pricing reconciliation | Baltic quoted EUR 4,950,000; the line items totalled EUR 4,885,000, a difference of EUR −65,000 (line items minus quote). | Reconcile the difference with the supplier. |
| Comparable scope | The lower quote excluded transport and did not meet parts of the technical scope. | Clarify scope and commercial terms before comparing costs. |
| Mandatory requirements | Both bidders failed gates; the higher weighted score did not make a bidder eligible. | Resolve evidence gaps and substantive deviations under the buyer's process. |
What this does — and does not — demonstrate
The saved run demonstrates these findings on one synthetic package. It does not establish accuracy across customers, verify certificate authenticity, or prove savings. Arithmetic in the current report is model-produced and should be checked independently.
For a pilot, compare the output with an experienced buyer's independently prepared review. Count missed critical issues, unsupported findings, corrections, and total review time.
Discuss a measured pilot Open the app